← Yorùbáland across borders

TAPESTRIES / PEOPLE & POPULATION

A people across borders.
A count with context.

Explore the states, countries and generations of the Yorùbá world. See what the numbers describe, where they stop, and how assumptions change the picture.

Evidence reviewed 6 October 2026 · mixed reference years · estimates remain revisable

Yorùbáland is a cultural geography; a state is an administrative unit. Its residents include people of many identities, while Yorùbá people also live far beyond it. State populations therefore provide context, not an ethnic headcount.

The ledger assembles an indicative 51.5 million across the numeric entries, including selected related Èdè communities. It is an incomplete, mixed-source working estimate—not a 2026 census, a statistical lower bound, or the total of everyone with Yorùbá ancestry. The older Atlantic diaspora and several modern destinations remain unquantified.

01 / RESIDENCE

Who lives in a place?

All residents, whatever their ancestry. Useful for schools, infrastructure and services.

02 / IDENTITY

Who identifies as Yorùbá?

Ethnic or cultural belonging; language counts are a different, overlapping measure.

03 / DESCENT

Who has Yorùbá ancestors?

May include mixed ancestry and people who do not speak Yorùbá or use the identity today.

PEOPLE / ECONOMIES / GOVERNANCE

Nine states. Shared connections. Distinct identities.

Compare Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Ondo, Ekiti, Kwara, Kogi and Edo, then look across the border to the Republics of Benin and Togo. Edo is a neighbouring comparison, not a claim that Edo/Bini people are Yorùbá.

Evidence reviewed 25 October 2026. Each measure retains its own reference year; these are not live 2026 counts.

Population ≠ ethnicity

State figures cover all residents.

Revenue ≠ output

IGR is government income; GDP measures production.

Projection ≠ census

Modelled estimates are labelled separately.

Population: census and projection.

Two comparable state geographies, two different kinds of evidence: the 2006 census and the NPC 2023 projections published by NBS. Differences include assumed demographic change; they are not directly observed migration or a new census.

2006 census2023 projection
Lagos
9.11 m
13.71 m
Oyo
5.58 m
8.13 m
Ogun
3.75 m
6.51 m
Ondo
3.46 m
5.42 m
Edo
3.23 m
4.87 m
Kogi
3.31 m
4.56 m
Osun
3.42 m
4.49 m
Ekiti
2.40 m
3.67 m
Kwara
2.37 m
3.63 m
All-state residents; difference from census to projection
State2006 census2023 projectionDifference (%)
Lagos9,113,60513,710,86250.4%
Ogun3,751,1406,512,19573.6%
Oyo5,580,8948,127,48345.6%
Osun3,416,9594,494,97031.5%
Ondo3,460,8775,422,39956.7%
Ekiti2,398,9573,667,04752.9%
Kwara2,365,3533,626,88253.3%
Kogi3,314,0434,557,68637.5%
Edo3,233,3664,874,61350.8%

NBS / NPC · 2006 baseline ↗ · NBS · 2023 projections, Annex 3 ↗

Why the historical comparison starts in 2006

Administrative boundaries changed. Ekiti was separated from Ondo in 1996; a 1991 Ondo total therefore includes what later became Ekiti. Different projection vintages also revise assumptions. Joining older and newer forecasts can create a false impression of population decline or growth.

Revenue: a consistent fiscal series.

Internally generated revenue (IGR) is government revenue, not GDP or household wealth. Charts use GBP billions; tables show GBP, USD and NGN in that order. Nominal increases may reflect inflation, collection changes and economic activity.

2022 IGR2025 IGR
Lagos
0.33 £bn
0.88 £bn
Ogun
0.06 £bn
0.13 £bn
Edo
0.02 £bn
0.07 £bn
Oyo
0.03 £bn
0.05 £bn
Kwara
0.02 £bn
0.05 £bn
Ondo
0.02 £bn
0.03 £bn
Ekiti
0.01 £bn
0.03 £bn
Osun
0.01 £bn
0.03 £bn
Kogi
0.01 £bn
0.02 £bn
NBS IGR history · GBP / USD / NGN at fixed reference rates
State2022202320242025
Lagos£0.326bn
$0.429bn
₦651.146bn
£0.408bn
$0.537bn
₦815.865bn
£0.631bn
$0.831bn
₦1.262tn
£0.885bn
$1.165bn
₦1.769tn
Ogun£0.060bn
$0.079bn
₦120.584bn
£0.073bn
$0.097bn
₦146.875bn
£0.098bn
$0.128bn
₦194.934bn
£0.126bn
$0.166bn
₦252.356bn
Oyo£0.031bn
$0.041bn
₦62.246bn
£0.026bn
$0.035bn
₦52.745bn
£0.033bn
$0.043bn
₦65.287bn
£0.052bn
$0.068bn
₦103.246bn
Osun£0.012bn
$0.016bn
₦24.605bn
£0.014bn
$0.018bn
₦27.925bn
£0.027bn
$0.036bn
₦54.768bn
£0.028bn
$0.037bn
₦56.844bn
Ondo£0.016bn
$0.021bn
₦32.641bn
£0.021bn
$0.027bn
₦41.502bn
£0.024bn
$0.032bn
₦48.639bn
£0.030bn
$0.040bn
₦60.321bn
Ekiti£0.009bn
$0.011bn
₦17.030bn
£0.016bn
$0.021bn
₦32.096bn
£0.018bn
$0.023bn
₦35.214bn
£0.029bn
$0.038bn
₦57.091bn
Kwara£0.018bn
$0.024bn
₦35.757bn
£0.030bn
$0.039bn
₦59.643bn
£0.036bn
$0.047bn
₦71.197bn
£0.048bn
$0.063bn
₦95.357bn
Kogi£0.009bn
$0.012bn
₦18.214bn
£0.013bn
$0.018bn
₦26.780bn
£0.016bn
$0.021bn
₦32.013bn
£0.022bn
$0.029bn
₦43.941bn
Edo£0.024bn
$0.031bn
₦47.458bn
£0.032bn
$0.043bn
₦64.671bn
£0.046bn
$0.060bn
₦91.152bn
£0.066bn
$0.087bn
₦132.209bn

NBS · 2025 IGR release, published 24 September 2026 ↗

Share of the selected nine states’ IGR.

The denominator is only these nine states’ combined 2025 IGR. It is not Nigeria’s total revenue and not a share of Yorùbá wealth.

£1.286bn
$1.693bn
₦2.571tn

Combined 2025 IGR

2025 IGR shares among the nine selected states; percentages in the adjacent legendLagos: 68.8%Ogun: 9.8%Oyo: 4.0%Osun: 2.2%Ondo: 2.3%Ekiti: 2.2%Kwara: 3.7%Kogi: 1.7%Edo: 5.1%
  • Lagos68.8%
  • Ogun9.8%
  • Oyo4.0%
  • Osun2.2%
  • Ondo2.3%
  • Ekiti2.2%
  • Kwara3.7%
  • Kogi1.7%
  • Edo5.1%

Demographic change: fertility.

Total fertility rate, measured in children per woman: NPC estimates for 2015 and 2022 published by NBS. Fertility is one demographic influence alongside mortality and migration. These are not 2026 rates or an ethnic comparison.

2015 estimate2022 estimate
Kwara
5.12
5.55
Kogi
4.42
4.96
Edo
4.55
4.46
Ekiti
4.41
4.32
Oyo
4.53
4.27
Ondo
4.73
3.95
Osun
3.98
3.75
Ogun
4.74
3.35
Lagos
3.82
3.28
Total fertility rate · children per woman
State20152022
Lagos3.823.28
Ogun4.743.35
Oyo4.534.27
Osun3.983.75
Ondo4.733.95
Ekiti4.414.32
Kwara5.125.55
Kogi4.424.96
Edo4.554.46

NBS · Demographic Bulletin 2022, Annex 11 ↗

PRODUCTION / PLACE / REPRESENTATION

Economic output and the political map.

GDP below reproduces NGF’s 2023 state profiles. Their price basis and estimation method are not stated, so this is a source-specific snapshot, not a harmonised real-growth ranking. No GDP growth is calculated by joining it to a different series.

Whole-state output and representation · NGF and official legislatures
State / capitalGDP 2023 · GBP / USD / NGNHouse of Assembly seatsPresent-state formation
Lagos / Ikeja£16.532bn
$21.768bn
₦33.052tn

Source ↗
40 ↗1967
Ogun / Abeokuta£6.128bn
$8.069bn
₦12.252tn

Source ↗
26 ↗1976
Oyo / Ibadan£5.899bn
$7.767bn
₦11.793tn

Source ↗
32 ↗1976; Osun separated in 1991
Osun / Osogbo£3.710bn
$4.885bn
₦7.417tn

Source ↗
26 ↗1991
Ondo / Akure£4.387bn
$5.777bn
₦8.771tn

Source ↗
26 ↗1976; Ekiti separated in 1996
Ekiti / Ado-Ekiti£2.309bn
$3.041bn
₦4.617tn

Source ↗
26 ↗1996
Kwara / Ilorin£3.937bn
$5.184bn
₦7.871tn

Source ↗
24 ↗1967; boundaries later changed
Kogi / Lokoja£2.982bn
$3.927bn
₦5.963tn

Source ↗
25 ↗1991
Edo / Benin City£3.773bn
$4.968bn
₦7.544tn

Source ↗
24 ↗1991, from Bendel

Each Nigerian state has a unicameral House of Assembly responsible for state legislation, appropriation and executive oversight. Federal lawmaking sits with the National Assembly: Senate and House of Representatives. Traditional institutions and cultural regions are not substitutes for these constitutional chambers.

Lagos Ikeja

People and place

Èkó and a cosmopolitan population. State, metropolis and historic city are different geographical units.

Known for

Finance, trade, ports and logistics, manufacturing, technology and entertainment.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Ogun Abeokuta

People and place

Egba, Ìjẹ̀bú, Remo and Yewa communities; an industrial and agricultural corridor adjoining Lagos.

Known for

Industrial estates, cement and food manufacturing; cassava, rice and poultry.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Oyo Ibadan

People and place

Ìbàdàn, Ọ̀yọ́ and Òkè-Ògùn; a large inland network of cities, towns and farms.

Known for

Education, health and services in Ibadan; cassava, cocoa, poultry and agro-processing.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Osun Osogbo

People and place

Ilé-Ifẹ̀, Òṣogbo, Ìjẹ̀ṣà and Ìgbómìnà communities; historic urban centres and rural hinterlands.

Known for

Cocoa, oil palm, cassava, gold, trade and cultural tourism.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Ondo Akure

People and place

Oǹdó, Akure, Owo, Akoko and coastal communities; substantial internal diversity.

Known for

Cocoa, oil and gas, fisheries and Idanre tourism; bitumen is a resource opportunity, not a claim of full commercial production.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Ekiti Ado-Ekiti

People and place

Èkìtì towns and kingdoms; a separate state since 1996, previously part of Ondo.

Known for

Agriculture, education and public service; cocoa, rice, cassava, oil palm and tourism.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Kwara Ilorin

People and place

Offa, Oró, Edidi and other Yorùbá communities share a multiethnic state with other peoples.

Known for

Agriculture, commerce, services, agro-processing and aviation-related facilities.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Kogi Lokoja

People and place

Okun and other Yorùbá communities form part of a multiethnic state; the whole state is not Yorùbáland.

Known for

Cashew and other agriculture; iron ore, limestone and cement, including the Itakpe and Obajana industrial connections.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

Edo Benin City

People and place

Edo is included as a neighbouring comparison requested by Lekan. Benin City and Edo/Bini heritage are not relabelled as Yorùbá; historical connections do not erase distinct identities.

Known for

Rubber, oil palm, cocoa, timber, agro-processing, oil and gas; Benin art and cultural heritage.

NGF state profile ↗ · Legislature source ↗

MOVEMENT / OPPORTUNITY / CONNECTION

Migration: patterns, not invented flows.

Within states

Over 80% of migrants in the analysed national sample moved from somewhere within their current state.

Between states

Lagos and the FCT were major destinations. Neighbouring states also showed strong migration links.

Across borders

Trade journeys, permanent relocation and diaspora ancestry measure different things. Cross-border trading communities cannot be counted as recent Nigerian emigrants by default.

The UN/IOM/UNICEF analysis uses Nigeria’s 2021 MICS sample aged 15–49. Nearly 60% of women and almost 50% of men sampled had moved at some point. These are national survey findings, not Yorùbá-specific rates or annual state migration totals. Economic opportunity, marriage and conflict are suggested explanations; the survey did not directly ask why people moved.

Internal Migration Trends in Nigeria · 2023 ↗

BENIN REPUBLIC / TOGO REPUBLIC

Homeland communities across national borders.

Benin City is in Edo State, Nigeria. The Republic of Benin is a separate country. Yorùbá, Nago and related communities in Benin, and Ifè communities in Togo, have long local histories. National statistics below describe their wider setting, not their own population or production.

National context only · not ethnic totals
MeasureBenin RepublicTogo Republic
Earlier national census6,769,914 (2002); 10,008,749 (2013)8,095,498 (2022)
National population estimate · 202514,814,4608,591,626
National GDP · 2025, GBP / USD / NGN£18.658bn
$24.566bn
₦37.301tn
£9.030bn
$11.890bn
₦18.054tn
National real GDP growth · 20258.1%6.3%
National net migration estimate · 2025−7,847−15,010
National legislatureNational Assembly (109 seats) and SenateNational Assembly (113 seats); Senate (61 statutory seats)

World Bank · Benin ↗ · World Bank · Togo ↗

Net migration is arrivals minus departures, not the number of people who left. National GDP equivalents are shown in GBP, USD and NGN and are not added to the Nigerian state figures. Benin’s Senate follows the 2025 constitutional revision; Togo’s parliamentary system also has two chambers. Statutory seats do not imply every seat is currently occupied.

Benin: settlement and identity

The 2013 census category “Yoruba et apparentés” represented 12.0% nationally. Within departments, the share was 68.7% in Plateau, 46.2% in Collines, 10.9% in Littoral and 10.1% in Ouémé. These percentages describe each department’s population, not the distribution of all Yorùbá people.

The older ledger below uses a constant-share scenario for 2025; it is an explicit assumption, not an updated ethnic census. This dashboard keeps the observed 2013 category separate.

Togo: communities without an invented total

Ifè communities around Atakpamé and Ogou are documented in Togolese cultural reporting. No comparable official Yorùbá-specific population or output total was verified for this edition. The 2022 census reports a national urban share of 42.9% and female share of 51.3%; neither is an ethnic profile.

Benin’s economy is shaped by agriculture, Cotonou’s port, trade and transport. Togo combines Lomé’s logistics role with agriculture, phosphates and industrial development. Benin–Nigeria trade was disrupted by Nigeria’s 2019–2020 border closure; commercial mobility should not be confused with permanent migration.

Sources, dates and downloadable data

Population: NBS/NPC, 2006 census and 2023 projection. Fertility: NBS 2022 bulletin. Revenue: NBS 2025 IGR release. GDP and economic specialisms: individual NGF profiles. Legislative seats: linked official sources in the matrix.

Download the state comparison (CSV) · Download data and source ledger (JSON)

Earlier 2019 baseline and optional 2026 scenario

The Nigerian states: population and place.

These eight states contain major Yorùbá communities. The table gives all-state residents in the official 2019 projection series. Kwara and Kogi include substantial non-Yorùbá populations; the other states are not ethnically uniform either. No verified state-by-state ethnic percentages are imposed.

NBS · Demographic Statistics Bulletin 2020, Annex 1. This older, directly inspectable common series is retained as a baseline rather than presented as the latest count. The optional 2026 column is our calculation, not an official update.

State residents · not Yorùbá ethnic populations
State2019 projection2026 scenarioGeographical context
Èkó (Lagos)12,772,884—Èkó and a cosmopolitan population
Oyo7,512,855—Ìbàdàn, Ọ̀yọ́ and Òkè-Ògùn
Ogun5,945,275—Egba, Ìjẹ̀bú, Remo and Yewa communities
Ondo4,969,707—Oǹdó, Akure, Owo, Akoko and coastal communities
Osun4,237,396—Ilé-Ifẹ̀, Òṣogbo, Ìjẹ̀ṣà and Ìgbómìnà communities
Ekiti3,350,401—Èkìtì towns and kingdoms
Kwara3,259,613—Oró, Edidi, Offa and other communities; multiethnic state
Kogi4,153,734—Okun and other Yorùbá communities; multiethnic state

The state rows are not added to the worldwide ledger.

Read more: where a state map stops helping

Yorùbá people in Abuja, northern Nigeria, Edo and other states also belong in a Nigeria-wide estimate. Equally, adding all of Kwara and Kogi to the six southwestern states would count neighbouring peoples as Yorùbá. Estimating the population within a cultural outline would require a defined boundary, spatial population data and a separate question about identity. This table does not claim to have done that.

Administrative totals also differ from cities: Èkó (Lagos) State, metropolitan Èkó (Lagos) and Èkó as a historical place are not interchangeable. Return to the atlas to explore the geography behind the names.

Across countries, with the definitions attached.

Benin and Togo contain longstanding homeland communities, not simply Nigerian emigrants. Elsewhere in West Africa, trading, settlement, displacement and return migration have produced histories that do not fit neatly into “old” and “new.”

Source caution: most country entries below come from Joshua Project, an evangelical mission research database. Its estimates are useful leads, with uneven coverage and no common census year in the country table. They are not official statistics. The Benin calculation and Canadian census subgroup are explicitly different measures.

Country ledger · numeric precision reflects source entries, not certainty
Country / coveragePeopleMeasure & assumptionSource
Nigeria47,784,000Compiled estimate
Entire country; includes Yorùbá outside the southwestern states. Not a territorial Yorùbáland count.
Joshua Project
Benin1,776,000Derived scenario · 2025
14,800,000 × 12% = 1,776,000. Assumes the 2013 “Yoruba and related” share persists. Replaces, rather than adds to, the narrower Joshua Project Benin entry.
Benin state report to the UN · UNFPA
Togo410,000Combined related categories
151,000 Yoruba + 186,000 Ife + 73,000 Kambole. Treats the source’s separately listed categories as non-overlapping; local identities remain distinct.
Joshua Project · Joshua Project · Joshua Project
Ghana568,000Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
Côte d’Ivoire154,000Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
Niger89,000Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
Burkina Faso85,000Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
Liberia28,000Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
The Gambia13,000Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
Sierra Leone7,100Compiled estimate
Yorùbá country entry; includes communities with differing migration histories.
Joshua Project
Ghana · related Ife category46,000Related category
Separate source category added once; not part of the 568,000 Yoruba entry in this database.
Joshua Project
Mali and other West African countriesNot quantifiedNo comparable count verified for this edition. Mali appears in the community network; absence of a number does not mean absence of people.Yoruba Indigenes’ Foundation
Equatorial Guinea88,000Compiled estimate
Selected country entry, not a total for Central Africa.
Joshua Project
South Africa, Uganda and the rest of AfricaNot quantifiedCommunity network evidence; no comparable continent-wide remainder verified.Yoruba Indigenes’ Foundation
United Kingdom105,000Compiled estimate
Selective country coverage; not an official ethnic census or a count of migration generations.
Joshua Project
Italy56,000Compiled estimate
Selective country coverage; not an official ethnic census or a count of migration generations.
Joshua Project
Ireland10,000Compiled estimate
Selective country coverage; not an official ethnic census or a count of migration generations.
Joshua Project
Greece5,000Compiled estimate
Selective country coverage; not an official ethnic census or a count of migration generations.
Joshua Project
Finland1,200Compiled estimate
Selective country coverage; not an official ethnic census or a count of migration generations. Source lists this outside its main total.
Joshua Project
Czechia400Compiled estimate
Selective country coverage; not an official ethnic census or a count of migration generations. Source lists this outside its main total.
Joshua Project
France and the rest of EuropeNot quantifiedFrance is represented in the community network. The subtotal below leaves unmeasured countries unfilled.Yoruba Indigenes’ Foundation
United States205,000Compiled estimate
Migration-era ancestry is not separated. Not a count of all African Americans with possible Yorùbá ancestry.
Joshua Project
Canada41,740Census subgroup · 2021
Yorùbá ethnic/cultural origin among Black populations: 30,920 single + 10,820 multiple responses. Replaces the much smaller mission-database entry.
Statistics Canada
Other recent-migration communities in the AmericasNot quantifiedNo comparable country-by-country remainder verified; separate from the Atlantic ancestry question.Toyin Falola
China and the rest of AsiaNot quantifiedThe network identifies a China representative. This is not enough to estimate China, the Gulf, India or other Asian destinations.Yoruba Indigenes’ Foundation
Australia2,100Compiled estimate
Small-group entry outside the source’s main total. Language and ancestry counts can differ.
Joshua Project
New Zealand and the rest of OceaniaNot quantifiedNo comparable count verified for this edition.Joshua Project
Read more: Benin, Togo and related identities

Benin: the 2013 national category “Yoruba et apparentés” was 12%. Holding that share constant against UNFPA’s rounded 2025 total of 14.8 million produces about 1.78 million. This assumes no change in relative growth, migration or classification. It replaces the narrower 261,000 “Yoruba” entry in Joshua Project; adding both would overlap categories.

Togo: the working 410,000 adds three separately listed database entries: Yoruba, Ife and Kambole. That is a broader cultural-family convention, not an instruction about how any individual should identify, and not a census total. The Ghana Ife entry is likewise separate and explicitly labelled.

Do not absorb neighbouring peoples: the database’s broader “Yoruba cluster” also includes Igala and Itsekiri. Its total is excluded. Linguistic relationship is not permission to overwrite a people’s identity. Joshua Project · broader “Yoruba cluster”.

The newer diaspora: visible communities, incomplete counts.

Here “newer diaspora” means modern migration and subsequent generations. Available figures often identify language or ethnic origin rather than migration era. The entries below are proxies for contemporary communities; they cannot cleanly separate every recent-migrant descendant from older Atlantic ancestry.

Regional subtotals of the numeric country entries
RegionCovered entriesMeaning
Homeland countries49,970,000Sum of listed entries only; definitions and dates differ.
Other West Africa990,100Sum of listed entries only; definitions and dates differ.
Other Africa88,000Sum of listed entries only; definitions and dates differ.
Europe177,600Sum of listed entries only; definitions and dates differ.
Americas · modern entries246,740Sum of listed entries only; definitions and dates differ.
AsiaUnquantifiedNo numeric entry; not zero people.
Oceania2,100Sum of listed entries only; definitions and dates differ.

Europe’s numeric entries sum to 177,600; the United States and Canadian subgroup together contribute 246,740; Australia contributes 2,100. Together that is about 426,000 in the listed non-African entries, not the full newer diaspora. Asia is unquantified, and many destinations and descendants are missing.

Read more: why language, nationality and ancestry cannot be added

The ONS · Census 2021 main language (TS024) measures main language in England and Wales among people aged three and over. It is not a count of all Yorùbá people in the United Kingdom. A person with Yorùbá ancestry may report English as their main language. The US Census Bureau · Language use definitions also warns us through its categories: some tables group several West African languages together.

Canada’s official analysis reports 41,740 Yorùbá ethnic/cultural-origin responses within its Black populations, compared with a much smaller 3,700 entry in the mission database. We use the census subgroup once, and do not add its language count. This discrepancy is one reason the assembled total should not be sold as precise. Statistics Canada · Black populations, 2021, Chart 20.

Birthplace and nationality also miss local-born children and can include non-Yorùbá Nigerians. Community organizations establish a presence, not a headcount. Their work in China, France, Mali, South Africa and Uganda helps show where research should continue. Yoruba Indigenes’ Foundation · community network.

The older diaspora: ancestry beyond enumeration.

The Atlantic slave trade carried people from Yorùbá societies into the Americas. Their descendants preserved, reworked and shared names, music, language and knowledge under profoundly different conditions. A person can have Yorùbá ancestry alongside several other ancestries; cultural participation and descent need not coincide. Toyin Falola · Yorùbá Diaspora (Oxford, 2022).

Brazil

Nagô / Kétu heritage, especially associated with Bahia; language, music and Candomblé carry lasting connections.

Descendant population: not reliably quantified here.

Historical source

Cuba

Lucumí traditions preserve and transform Yorùbá inheritances. Religious participation is not a genealogical register.

Descendant population: not reliably quantified here.

Historical source

Haiti

Nagô and other Yorùbá-linked inheritances form part of a wider, diverse Haitian cultural history. Vodou affiliation is not a Yorùbá ancestry count.

Descendant population: not reliably quantified here.

Historical source

Trinidad and Tobago

Orisha / Shango traditions and archival songs connect the islands with the Atlantic Yorùbá story.

Descendant population: not reliably quantified here.

Historical source

Jamaica

Part of the Atlantic diaspora described in historical scholarship; a current Yorùbá-descendant total was not verified.

Descendant population: not reliably quantified here.

Historical source

United States and other destinations

Older ancestry, newer African migration and onward Caribbean or Brazilian migration can overlap within one family.

Descendant population: not reliably quantified here.

Historical source
Read more: why there is no invented Brazil–Cuba–Haiti total

Brazil’s census racial categories do not isolate Yorùbá ancestry. Neither a Black/brown population total nor a count of Candomblé participants answers “how many people have at least one Yorùbá ancestor?” The same mismatch applies when people substitute Santería or Vodou participation for descent. IBGE · Brazil Census 2022, color or race.

Historical embarkation records and cultural archives can illuminate connections. They cannot simply be multiplied by present national populations: family lines intersect, migration continues, and ancestors are shared. A genetic reference population called “Yoruba” is not a census of all living descendants either. This edition therefore leaves descendant totals unquantified, rather than printing unsupported millions.

“Old” and “new” are historical lenses, not separate kinds of people. A Brazilian, Cuban or Haitian family may now live in Europe or North America, and one person may belong to both migration histories. Any future total must count each person once by present residence.

The grand estimate—and its unfinished edges.

INDICATIVE PARTIAL LEDGER≈ 51.5 million

About 51.0 million in the listed African entries + 0.43 million in the listed non-African entries.

Plus unquantified populations, with overlap still to resolve. Older diaspora descendants and missing modern communities cannot yet be assigned a defensible combined number.

Exactly what went into the partial estimate
CategoryIncluded subtotalTreatment
Nigeria, Benin and Togo49,970,000Country-wide entries; selected related communities included.
Other West Africa990,100Listed countries and Ghana’s separate Ife entry only.
Other Africa88,000Equatorial Guinea only; remainder unquantified.
Europe, Americas and Oceania426,440Selected modern entries; no clean migration-era split.
Asia and other missing modern communitiesUnquantifiedNot treated as zero population.
Older diaspora / wider descentUnquantifiedNo separate numeric addition; overlap unresolved.
Arithmetic subtotal51,474,540Rounded to 51.5 million to avoid implying false precision.

This is a transparent working estimate, not a consensus demographic finding. It combines a mission-database snapshot, an assumed Benin share and a Canadian census subgroup from different dates. Missing entries could increase coverage, while errors or overlapping definitions could change it in either direction. It is not a confidence interval or a proven minimum.

Explore assumptions: build your own conditional total

Adjust the Nigeria entry or supply net additional people not already covered. Blank means unknown. Inputs are your hypotheses, not sourced estimates. In particular, no default number is invented for the older diaspora. Values are in millions.

Formula: partial ledger − 47.784 million + your Nigeria assumption + any net additions supplied. Even if every field is completed, the result is a conditional scenario, not a verified global estimate. The state projection controls do not change this ledger.

Read more: does the evidence establish 70 million?

A total near 70 million may be proposed as a hypothesis, but the reviewed evidence does not establish it as a current ethnic count or prove that every diaspora group sits outside it. Moving from this partial ledger to 70 million would require about 18.5 million in net additions or revisions, with their definitions and evidence made explicit.

Historical census disputes warrant serious scrutiny; they do not tell us an exact correction to apply. The purpose of this page is to make our people more visible while keeping the arithmetic open to challenge. Identity does not need an inflated number to matter.

Sources, definitions and a reproducible ledger.

Download the population ledger (CSV) · Download the figures and source notes (JSON). A blank population field means unquantified, never zero.

  1. NBS · Demographic Statistics Bulletin 2020, Annex 1

    NPC state projections for 2019; PDF pages 13–14, printed pages 9–10. All residents, not ethnicity.

  2. Joshua Project · Yorùbá country entries

    Snapshot reviewed 6 October 2026. Mission research database, not a census; individual estimate years are not stated in the country table. Selective coverage and uncertain comparability.

  3. Joshua Project · Ife country entries

    Separate related Èdè category. Togo 186,000; Ghana 46,000. Snapshot reviewed 6 October 2026.

  4. Joshua Project · Kambole country entries

    Togo entry 73,000; Northern Nago. Snapshot reviewed 6 October 2026.

  5. Benin state report to the UN · RGPH-4 (2013)

    Ethnicity table: Yoruba et apparentés 12.0% nationally; 46.2% in Collines and 68.7% in Plateau. These are 2013 shares.

  6. UNFPA · Benin population, 2025

    National population 14.8 million, rounded. Multiplying this by the older 12% share is our scenario, not a UN ethnic estimate.

  7. Statistics Canada · Black populations, 2021, Chart 20

    30,920 single + 10,820 multiple Yorùbá ethnic/cultural-origin responses = 41,740 within the Black populations studied. A census-based subgroup count, not all Canadian ancestry or a 2026 estimate.

  8. ONS · Census 2021 main language (TS024)

    England and Wales, usual residents aged 3+. A language measure, not a UK-wide ancestry count; not added to the country estimate.

  9. US Census Bureau · Language use definitions

    Some published tables group Yoruba, Twi, Igbo and other West African languages. A grouped total cannot be presented as Yorùbá alone.

  10. Toyin Falola · Yorùbá Diaspora (Oxford, 2022)

    Historical orientation to the West African and Atlantic diasporas. Does not establish present-day descendant totals.

  11. Smithsonian Folkways · Across the Ocean, liner notes

    Historical recordings and interpretation of Brazilian, Cuban, Haitian and Trinidadian cultural continuities; not demographic enumeration.

  12. IPHAN · Yorùbá linguistic community in Brazil

    Documents cultural and linguistic heritage, including Candomblé da Nação Kétu. Its historical African speaker figure is not used as a current count.

  13. IBGE · Brazil Census 2022, color or race

    Broad racial categories do not isolate Yorùbá ancestry. No fraction of Brazil’s Black or brown population is automatically assigned here.

  14. Yoruba Indigenes’ Foundation · community network

    Lists representatives in China, France, Mali, South Africa and Uganda, among other locations. Evidence of organizational reach, not a population survey.

  15. Joshua Project · broader “Yoruba cluster”

    Includes distinct peoples such as Igala and Itsekiri. Its 54.214 million snapshot total is not used as an ethnic Yorùbá total.

Read further: the history behind the numbers

S. Adebanji Akintoye, A History of the Yoruba People (Amalion, 2010) and Akinwumi Ogundiran, The Yorùbá: A New History (Indiana University Press, 2020) provide wider historical reading. They are not cited as verification of this contemporary population ledger.

The next research step is better community enumeration: comparable questions, clear geography, self-described identity and transparent dates. That can help connect cultural education, language provision, enterprise and shared development possibilities to evidence.

YORÙBÁLAND / DEVELOPMENT

People are more than a population total.

Connect the population discussion with education, public services, skills and productive work. The development hub avoids inventing a single regional economy or workforce total.

Explore the development hub → · Open both interactive maps → · Sources and review

Odùduwà flag: blue and green fields, a white diagonal band edged in red, sixteen gold stars and a central sculptural head within a red wreath.
Flag image: Oramfe CC BY-SA 4.0.

SHARED SYMBOLS

A flag. A voice. A sense of belonging.

The Odùduwà flag carries a contemporary expression of Yorùbá identity across borders. Explore its colours, sixteen stars and central head, then listen to the Yorùbá nation anthem and the Ilé-Ifẹ̀ anthem.

Flag symbolism and Yorùbá nation anthem → · Ilé-Ifẹ̀ anthem and published lyrics →

EXPLAINABLE AI & DATA / READ THE METHOD

What a map can—and cannot—say.

Read the mapped layer, source date and geographic definition together. These visualisations are geographic explanations, not AI predictions or legal boundaries.

Follow the reasoning.

  1. SourceCheck the cited geography or estimate
  2. LayerChoose features and time context
  3. CompareInspect scale, area and definitions
  4. InterpretKeep cultural and modern boundaries distinct

Explore the building blocks.

AI Capability1
AI/Data Concepts2
Data Science Pipeline1
Responsible AI1
Visualisation2

Number of concepts in this guide, not performance or usage measures.

Explore the explanation matrix · 7 concepts

7 concepts shown

On small screens, scroll the table sideways. “Learning context” explains a related idea; it does not mean that method runs on this page. Deep learning is the standard term for “deep ML”.

Technical termTechnical description / definitionIn plain EnglishHow this page uses it
Geospatial layers and projectionVisualisationCoordinates are transformed to a map surface; separate layers encode geographic features or interpretations.Primary reference ↗A map combines evidence layers. Its boundary lines need a date and a meaning.Running here
Separate layers show geographic features and interpreted historical or cultural regions. The source and definition control their meaning.
Visual encodingVisualisationMapping values or categories to marks, position, length, colour and labels.Primary reference ↗Make the comparison visible, with a scale and a clear label.Running here
Position, colour, area and labels make comparisons visible; changing the map view does not improve source certainty.
Rates and denominatorsAI/Data ConceptsA rate or share relates a count to a defined exposure or eligible population.Primary reference ↗Keep the number underneath the fraction visible when comparing people or periods.Published analysis
Area or population comparisons require compatible definitions and reference dates.
Extraction, transformation and provenanceData Science PipelineETL moves data from sources through defined transformations; provenance records its origin and changes.Primary reference ↗Read it, tidy it, and keep the receipt.Method guide
Prepared geographic assets retain citations and boundaries of interpretation.
Probability and uncertaintyAI/Data ConceptsA probability quantifies an event under a model and assumptions; it is not a guarantee.Primary reference ↗A chance, not a promise. Ask what evidence and assumptions produced it.Responsible use
Approximate cultural extents and estimates should not be read as precise surveyed borders.
Human oversight and consentResponsible AIPeople retain appropriate review authority, permission controls and correction routes for data use and outputs.Primary reference ↗Keep someone able to question, correct or stop the result.Responsible use
The map supports learning and inquiry, with source notes and correction routes.
Machine learning (ML)AI CapabilityMethods that estimate patterns or parameters from examples to support inference on other inputs.Primary reference ↗Learn a pattern from examples, then check whether it helps with new ones.Learning context
These geographic views do not infer ethnicity, ancestry or future population from a trained ML model.
OSL · Olukotun Studios Ltd

Olukotun Studios Ltd · Registered in England and Wales · No. 17537910

LinkedIn ↗